by Mara Mills
about Mara Mills
Mara Mills is an Assistant Professor of Media, Culture, and Communication at New York University. She is currently completing a book titled On the Phone: Deafness and Communication Engineering. Her second book project, Print Disability and New Reading Formats, examines the reformatting of print over the course of the past century by blind and other print disabled readers. Her work has appeared in Social Text, differences, the IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, and The Oxford Handbook of Sound Studies.
Technology
The definition of technology has been the subject of considerable philosophical debate. Technology was a relatively denigrated topic in Western philosophy until the early modern period, as a result of the unfavorable distinctions—dating to ancient Greece—between _techne_ (craft knowledge) and _epistēmē_ (theory or science). “Technology” most commonly refers to manufactured things: artifacts, handiwork, devices, and machinery (Kline 1985, 215). The term “biotechnology,” coined in the twentieth century, refers to the manufacture or gainful modification of organisms, tissues, and life processes. Examples of biotechnology range from plant breeding to genetic engineering. Some scholars broaden the category of technology to include technics: technical skills, methods, and routines. More broadly still, others consider technologies to be “sociotechnical systems of use,” defined by Stephen Kline as “combinations of hardware and people” brought into being “to accomplish tasks that humans cannot perform without such systems—to extend human capacities” (1985, 216). Until recently, technology has been the subject of forceful critique rather than sustained analysis in the field of disability studies. According to the social model of disability, the lack of access to technological systems, especially those required for the performance of citizenship—from workplace architecture to municipal infrastructure to telecommunications networks—is a principal source of disability....