by Mimi Thi Nguyen
Zine
Let us start with a succinct definition of zine from Janice Radway, echoed across the academic literature: “Until zines emerged as digital forms, they were generally defined as handmade, noncommercial, irregularly issued, small-run, paper publications circulated by individuals participating in alternative, special-interest communities” (2011, 140). From here, the familiar story of the zine unfolds: the term zine is a recent derivation of fanzine, itself coined in the 1930s to refer to self-published magazines of science fiction, punks in the 1970s adopted the form to create an alternative infrastructure for a global phenomenon, and (some) girls and young women in the 1990s used zines to build a revolution of some kind—what kind exactly remains up for debate—upon a foundation of emotional intimacy and immediacy. Indeed, in academic studies and adjacent histories, the zine is most often heralded as a material form for the marginalized, as a medium of self-expression (without editors, advertisers, or censors) made through accessible means (using low-cost technologies of reproduction) in search of community (rather than audience) and infused with the tempo of immediacy, even urgency. These qualities of self-expression and community building are common themes for zine study, as found in Stephen Duncombe’s Notes from Underground (1997), the first academic monograph about zines and “alternative culture”: “The tension in the punk scene between the individual and the community, between freedom and rules, is a microcosm of the tension that exists within all the networked communities of the zine scene. Zines are profoundly personal expressions, yet as a medium of participatory communication they depend upon and help create community” (65).
Experience
The feminist movement maxim “The personal is political” underscores the connections between personal experiences and larger sociopolitical structures, but what this means in terms of not just what but how we know what we know is less clear. The formula has been understood to mean that our experiences are the wellspring of our most authentic politics, our most authentic truths, but what exactly mediates the movement between personal and structural?