by Martin F. Manalansan IV

About Martin F. Manalansan IV

Martin F. Manalansan IV is Associate Professor of Asian American Studies and Anthropology at the University of Illinois, Urbana-­Champaign. He is author of Global Divas: Filipino Gay Men in the Diaspora (2003). He has edited the following collections: (with Robert Ku and Anita Mannur) Eating Asian America: A Food Studies Reader (NYU Press, 2013), (with Arnaldo Cruz-­Malave) Queer Globalizations: Citizenship and the Afterlife of Colonialism (NYU Press, 2002), and Cultural Compass: Ethnographic Explorations of Asian America (2000).

Queer

“Queer” has become a ubiquitous term in quotidian, scholarly, mass media, and political discourses to characterize and name things, relationships, situations, practices, and bodies from TV shows such as Queer Eye for the Straight Guy to academic endeavors such as queer studies. Its pervasiveness has resulted in messy contexts and situations as it is deployed in multiple and oftentimes contradictory ways. In its various uses, “queer” is and can be a vernacular word, a political idiom, and an academic field of study. The crux of the contentious nature of “queer” is whether the right question is “what is queer?” or “what does ‘queer’ do?” Is “queer” about ontology, identity, and being, or is it about processes, mechanics, and/or frameworks of analysis? “Queer” is necessarily about both aspects or dimensions.