by Khatharya Um

About Khatharya Um

Khatharya Um is Associate Professor of Ethnic Studies and Chair of Peace and Conflict Studies at the University of California, Berkeley. She is co-­editor of Southeast Asian Migration: People on the Move in Search of Work, Marriage and Refuge (forthcoming 2015), author of From the Land of Shadows (forthcoming 2015), and has published articles in Positions, Southeast Asian Affairs, Refuge, and Amerasia Journal.

Genocide

Writing about genocide, Leo Kuper noted: “the word is new, the crime ancient” (1981, 9). While the annals of history are replete with mass killings and the deliberate, virtual decimation of communities, the term “genocide,” which is derived from the Greek word genos, meaning “race” or “people,” and the Latin word cīdere, “to kill,” was first articulated by Raphael Lemkin in 1944. In Axis Rule in Occupied Europe he defined genocide as “a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves” (1944, 79). Later adopted in the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG), the definition was modified to include an intent to destroy “in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group,” involving either actual physical destruction or the creation of conditions that would ultimately undermine the viability of the group’s continued existence, such as preventing reproduction or forcible transfer of children of one group to another (U.N. General Assembly 1948, 174). The CPPCG has since spawned new statutes and protocols to account for additional forms of mass atrocities and crimes not covered by the 1948 Convention, such as war crimes and crimes against humanity. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court adopted in 1998, genocide was recognized as one of four international crimes prosecutable in the international criminal court.