by Kelly Gates

About Kelly Gates

Kelly Gates is Associate Professor of Communication and Science Studies at the University of California, San Diego. She is the author of Our Biometric Future: Facial Recognition Technology and the Culture of Surveillance. Her work examines surveillance and visual media through the combined lenses of cultural studies and science and technology studies.

Surveillance

Surveillance literally means “watching over” and has a string of related associations—monitoring, tracking, observing, examining, regulating, controlling, gathering data, and invading privacy. The word is derived from the French term veiller and the Latin vigilare. It probably first appeared in the early nineteenth century in administrative reports, such as an 1807 document “Draft decree containing regulation for the maintenance and surveillance of the banks of the Rhine,” and an 1812 document “Draft decree on surveillance, organization, administration, accounting, police and discipline of French Theatre” (both French-language documents located using the Google Books search engine). Google Books Ngram Viewer, an imperfect tool that measures the appearance of words and phrases in books printed since 1500, shows a sharp increase in the use of the word “surveillance” in English-language texts beginning in the 1960s. Writing in the early 1970s, a prominent sociologist of bureaucracy defined surveillance as “any form of systematic attention to whether rules are obeyed, to who obeys and who does not, and to how those who deviate can be located and sanctioned” (Rule 1973, 40). The term implies efforts to govern or control the activities of individuals under observation, and in this sense always signifies a power relationship. It is most often associated with preventing certain behaviors, but it can also connote efforts to encourage, enjoin, or even manipulate people into taking certain actions or conducting themselves in a particular manner. The term is sometimes used in reference to the monitoring of things like plant life, insects, animals, weather, viruses, and machines, but such uses tend to neutralize its political valence and make it synonymous with “observation.” While this usage is correct in a literal sense, it robs the word itself of some of its signifying power.