by John Nieto-Phillips

about John Nieto-Phillips

John Nieto-Phillips is Associate Professor of History and Latino Studies at Indiana University. His current book project examines how Latinas/os figured into global Hispanist networks and U.S. language rights struggles.

Language

Among Latinas and Latinos, language is a complex and sometimes vexing matter. Inextricably bound up in notions of identity and civic belonging, language lies at the center of contemporary discourse about immigration, education, and citizenship; as such, it is inherently a political subject. But language usage is also intensely personal, often grounded in intimate contexts and choices. While both public and private dilemmas over language arise from the pressures of the present day, they might also be understood as the product of historical forces spanning oceans and continents. For centuries, states have utilized language, variously, to amalgamate, colonize, coopt, or marginalize groups of people. In the Western world, Latin was the Roman Empire’s lingua franca, enabling the administration of vast domains composed of disparate societies and tongues. In the modern age, the French, English, Portuguese, and Spanish empires used language to strengthen and expand their imperial domains (Lodares 2007). The Spanish Crown, for example, came to view the language of Castile as foundational to its peninsular and, eventually, global ambitions. During the fifteenth century, _castellano_ eclipsed other Iberian vernaculars and aided the “Catholic Monarchs,” Ferdinand and Isabella, in their consolidation of their Iberian dominions. During the sixteenth century, it enabled...