by Evelyn Arizpe

About Evelyn Arizpe

Evelyn Arizpe is Professor of Children’s Literature at the University of Glasgow and Leader of the Erasmus Mundus Joint Master’s Degree program, Children’s Literature, Media and Culture. She is the co-author (with Morag Styles) of Children Reading Picturebooks: Interpreting Visual Texts (2003/2016) and Visual Journeys through Wordless Narratives (2014; with Carmen Martínez-Roldán and Teresa Colomer). She is the co-editor of Children as Readers in Children’s Literature: The Power of Text and the Importance of Reading (2016) and Young People Reading: Empirical Research across International Contexts (2018). Her current research is on “Children’s Literature in Critical Contexts of Displacement: Exploring How Story and Arts-Based Practices Create ‘Safe Spaces’ for Displaced Children and Young People.”

Transnational

According to the OED, definitions of the adjectival form of transnational cluster around the idea of extending beyond national frontiers or political boundaries into a social space that is multinational or global. The term has close connections to other concepts that “challenge the stable and fixed (hegemonic) concept of the national” (Higbee and Hwee Lim 2010, 10), such as multicultural or cosmopolitan. Like its cognates, transnational stems from movements that incline toward making nation states irrelevant, yet the etymology remains rooted in the geopolitical notion of “nation,” an indication of the difficulties faced by attempts to ignore prescribed geopolitical boundaries and the securities afforded by “imagined communities” (Anderson 1983). The term first appeared in English in 1921, entering the lexicon through economics and then seeping into other disciplines. Since then, its various derivatives (transnationality, transnationalism) have become so snarled up in political and scholarly discussion in a variety of fields that scholars have had to defend the value of continuing to use the term—if only as a conceptual form that implies an understanding of nation as “a thing contested, interrupted, and always shot through with contradiction” (Briggs, McCormick, and Way 2008, 627).