by Alyshia Gálvez

About Alyshia Gálvez

Alyshia Gálvez is Associate Professor and Director of the CUNY Institute of Mexican Studies at Lehman College. She is the author of Guadalupe in New York: Devotion and the Struggle for Citizenship Rights among Mexican Immigrants and Patient Citizens, Immigrant Mothers: Mexican Women, Public Prenatal Care, and the Birth Weight Paradox, which was awarded the 2012 Book Award by the Association of Latino and Latin American Anthropologists.

Migration

“Migration” was initially used in early sixteenth-century French to refer to human movement across space. These early usages date to the initial period of European conquest and colonization of the Americas, arguably the first phase of what is today referred to as globalization (Wolf 1982). The contexts of these usages were largely historical and literary, referring to the expulsion of Adam from Eden or the travel of a person from one town to another. A century later, “migration” was deployed by natural scientists in reference to the migration of birds, salmon, and butterflies. This naturalistic use of the term predominated into the twentieth century, as the natural and social sciences came to view animal and human actions, relations, and movements in an empiricist light, as objective and apolitical (Foucault 1976/1990, 1975/1995). Human migration was thus dehumanized, reduced to a mechanistic response to availability of resources. Whether nomadic groups crossing the ice bridge in the Bering Sea twenty thousand years ago or Canada geese flying south for the winter, humans and animals can be expected to move to where they find the necessities of life. Pioneering studies of human migration in the fields of geography and demography were influenced by this orientation, charting “laws of migration” and the “push” and “pull” factors that expelled migrants from their homes and attracted them to new lands (Ravenstein 1885; Everett Lee 1966).

Migration (March 2024)

“Migration crisis.” It is rare lately to hear the word migration without it being used as an adjective attached to the noun crisis. In the last two years (or is it thirty?), those of us living in the United States have seen human mobility increasingly framed as an emergency. People from across the political spectrum are expressing alarm at the pace of new arrivals, even as most of those arriving are entering with inspection at ports of entry, visas in hand or requesting asylum, as is their legal right. The total number of undocumented immigrants in the United States peaked in 2007 and has declined since. But images of a “porous border” and panic that a “flood” of migrants is invading the United States predominate our use of the term migration and shape our politics.