by Ashley Dawson

About Ashley Dawson

Ashley Dawson is Professor of English at the CUNY Graduate Center. He is the author of the Routledge Concise History of Twentieth-Century British Literature (forthcoming) and Mongrel Nation: Diasporic Culture and the Making of Postcolonial Britain (2007), and coeditor of three essay collections: Democracy, the State, and the Struggle for Global Justice (2009); Dangerous Professors: Academic Freedom and the National Security Campus (2009); and Exceptional State: Contemporary U.S. Culture and the New Imperialism (2007).

Imperialism

The great waves of European expansion that began in 1492 were characterized by fundamental ideological and material transformations in people’s relations to land. In his Second Treatise of Government (1689) the English philosopher John Locke, who owned plantations in both Ireland and the American colonies, wrote, “He who appropriates land to himself by his labor does not lessen but increase the common stock of mankind” (Locke 1988, 293). Later in the Treatise, Locke explicitly references the Native Americans as an example of people who, appearing to him to do no labor, consequently fail to develop the Earth according to god’s plan and therefore can stake no legitimate claim of ownership to the land on which they live. Locke’s argument was central to the creation of private property and, more broadly, to the process of enclosure of communal lands that unfolded in the British Isles and in England’s far-flung colonies in the centuries before and after Locke wrote. Marx called this “primitive accumulation,” a process through which people were separated from their land and their means of production. Fundamental to the birth of capitalism, this history was “written in the annals of mankind in letters of blood and fire” (Marx 1976 [1990], 875).